There are several reason why I will not switch to a Mac, and I thought I would outline them right here for you.  I am not a PC loyalist, but there are endless things that erk me the wrong way.

Corporate companies do not buy Macs

I have been in the corporate world for about 10 years now.  How many Macs have I seen: 3.  How many IT people know anything about Macs: not many.  Where do Mac requests go: they are pawned off onto others.

Macs are shiny turds

Sure Macs have a decent operating system, but there are many things going against them (to be mentioned soon).  You can't take a pile of crap, make it pretty, and expect it to be wonderful.  It's still just a steaming pile of pretty crap with users that advocate their butts off (more on the users to come).

The Mac advocates are their converts' tech support

"Macs are great.  You should buy one.  You aren't cool unless you buy one.  Alright I bought one, now what?   Everyone around me knows PC.  How about I ask the person that converted me."

I think I will just stick with pushing PC.  I have enough problems to want to become someone's tech support.  Everyone uses a PC.  Good luck finding help from the people around you.

Mac users are awful

My brother once said, "It's not Macs that I hate, it's Mac users."  Couldn't be more true.  Mac users are like a cult.  It's like the Mormons knocking on your door and trying to get you to convert.  It's relentless.  It's an elite club.  If you don't have a Mac, you are inferior.  It sounds a lot like a religion, doesn't it?

Mac users are defensive.  PC users have at least one thing that Mac users don't.  It's the ability to keep their mouth shut about how fantastically wonderful their computer is.

How about an arm with a side order of leg?

Macs cost a ton.  Steve Jobs said in a previous speaking engagement that Macs are the same price as PCs.  Couldn't be more false.  How about a Mac Pro for close to $4,000.  That's with 1GB of Ram.  Who gets an 8 core machine with 1 GB of RAM.  It's only $300 more for each GB of RAM.  Ridiculous.

Why no viruses?

Because there aren't any Macs. Their market share is pathetic.  The share is growing, which means one thing; they are going to become targets of viruses, and other creepy crawlies that supposedly plague PC users.  The more market penetration, the more likely that someone will become more malicious against your system. 

Is Mac security better?  Probably not, but why would hackers target a small group when they can have their way with an army of PC users.

Would you like black, white, white or white?

You don't like the Mac's style?  Too bad.  There are endless possibilities with PCs.  You can build your own.  You choose your own hardware.  You don't have to wait months and months for a new shiny turd to come out.

Let's face it.  All hardware is made in China anyways.  Stick a fancy cover around it and it becomes a premium.

Games?  What games?

PCs have tons and tons and tons of games.  Macs don't, and the ones they do have suck.

Ridiculous ads

If Mac ads were true, then all a PC could do is Word process and crunch numbers.  Let's face it; PCs can do more.  There is more software, which is everything.  What good is the shiny turd without instructions?

Macs crash too

I have been running Vista since the beginning.  How many times has it crashed: 1.  I walked into the graphic designers cube.  We tried to open an Illustrator document and it crashed.  It proceeded to crash 3 times before I was forced to leave and come back.

More arms, more legs

Want to go from 10.1 to 10.2.  Cha ching.  Want service pack 2.  Here you are for the cost of a library book.  If you argue that those are major upgrades, I completely disagree.  You may get a few new features that are free downloads for PC.

There, I feel better now. 

In conclusion, while Macs are a viable option, please read the post above and made an actual decision based on the facts, not what Jim Jones says to you. (extra points to those that get the Jim Jones reference.)

Edit:  And one more thing.  iTunes is the next "Real Player".  What an awful music interface.

 

posted on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:08 PM | Filed Under [ Mark Says ]

Comments

# re: Why I will not switch to a Mac
Posted by laura on 10/31/2007 3:50 PM
i like to call them "macintrash".

a PC with linux is where it's at! :D
# re: Why I will not switch to a Mac
Posted by Michele on 11/1/2007 5:29 PM
Wow....tell us how you really feel, Mark!!
# re: Why I will not switch to a Mac
Posted by Jason on 11/6/2007 4:31 PM
To play devil's advocate, there are some things I'll point out and some comments I have.
I find it interesting you don't like Macs and at the same time speak highly of Windows Vista. I have run Vista on many different systems and I have reverted back to XP every time. Almost every benchmarking application I remember looking up had scores that ran lower on the same PC with Vista vs. XP. I wont even bring up DirectX 10.

As far being a turd, PC World called the Macbook Pro the Fastest Windows Vista Laptop of 2007. http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,136649-page,3-c,notebooks/article.html

I don't own a Mac, but I don't try to turn people away from them either. The irony is, the people that I don't know real well (or don't want to) I suggest macs to them for the reason of stability. I don't want to be their 24X7 tech support and macs (that I have dealt with) have been very stable, reliable PC's that pander to their "I like computers but they scare me" attitude.

Above all else, we are running the bleeding edge of processors at my plant and Apple is a huge customer for us now. Just my .02
# re: Why I will not switch to a Mac
Posted by Mark on 11/7/2007 8:43 AM
You make some good points.

As far as Windows Vista, I am in the same boat as you. For me it's not a functionality issue, but it is a performance issue. 1 GB of RAM just doesn't do it, especially with the .NET development tools I run. Visual Studio.NET 2003 didn't even run correctly without a patch in Vista.

Your reference to the MacBook Pro, I wonder if people actually buy the hardware to run Windows, and why would they want to switch from Mac to Windows if they bought a Mac.

Do you really think an Apple is more user friendly to use? In my opinion, it is the machine you were brought up on. For new users, it's hard to determine what would be a better choice.

Thanks for the response. I bet it is pretty interesting working with Apple now.
# re: Why I will not switch to a Mac
Posted by Jeff on 11/8/2007 7:38 PM
Ok, my turn. Since Jason did not, i will talk about DirectX 10. Ok, so at first glance it was a bust. John Carmack (the most legendary game and game engine programmer in the business) even said that he is not convinced that DX 10 is worth the leap yet. In some ways I agree with him. The performance is not good. I have a Geforce 8800 GTS 640 and running games in DX 10, such as World in Conflict or the Crysis demo, results in a substantial FPS hit. The thing that makes me keep using Vista and coming back to DX 10 is the ridiculous visual upgrade that is apparent. Just about everything looks better.

Now, what I think Mark Baylor was trying to say in his rant was that Mac users are dumb. I will go ahead and say it. You ask any average Mac user why they like Macs over PCs and they say: "They are just better" or if by chance you get a Mac user with an IQ over 48 they say: "They are so much better at video editing and graphics stuff." That would make sense considering the same exact software is available for both PC users and Mac users. And that would explain every gaming company programs games for the PC. Nope. Macs are better because they are better.

This next comment is to Jason. I would like a QX6850 Kentsfield. Let me know when that is ready to go for me.
# re: Why I will not switch to a Mac
Posted by Jason on 11/13/2007 11:20 AM
Eww. QX6850's are sooooo 6 months ago. The new hotness is the QX9650's. I'm taking Jen and the kids with me to the blood bank to sell plasma this Christmas to get one.
Also, Crysis makes my computer cry at the moment, even with quad sli. :-(
# re: Why I will not switch to a Mac
Posted by Jeff on 11/13/2007 1:03 PM
I wish the QX9650 was not going to cost over a grand....that is the only thing holding me back. I take it you have two 7900 GX2 cards in your machine. That is ridiculous. I have one 8800 GTS and looking to get another soon. Crysis runs at about 30 fps on my machine and that is mostly due to an aging processor (X2 4600). I am thinking about selling crack so I can raise the funds (just kidding Mom and Dad, but seriously).
# Incest.
Posted by Gay incest stories. on 6/20/2008 10:14 PM
Incest bbs. Incest pictures. Incest cartoons. Incest quest. Incest sex.
# Free incest pictures.
Posted by Family incest. on 6/22/2008 3:46 PM
Free incest stories. Incest sex stories. Mom son incest. Lesbian incest. Incest stories. Free incest cartoons.
# Incest.
Posted by Free incest stories. on 6/22/2008 3:56 PM
Free incest stories. Incest stories free. Teen incest. Incest. Free incest porn. Incest xxx. Incest sex. Incest story.
# Anal sex.
Posted by Anal sex lessons. on 6/23/2008 5:24 PM
Anal sex toys. Anal sex. Anal sex stories. First anal sex. Anal sex videos.
Post Comment
Title *
Name *
Email
Url
Comment *  
Please add 7 and 1 and type the answer here: